Publication Search
Publication Homepage
Publication Search by Topic or Keywords
Sonia M. Ospina
45 publications found:
2009
Ospina, Sonia
“Weaving Color Lines: Race, Ethnicity, and the Work of Leadership in Social Change Organizations,” Leadership, Vol 5, Issue 2, Forthcoming December 2009
View publication 
2008
Ospina, Sonia and Jennifer Dodge.
“Narrative Inquiry,” Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy, Second Edition, 2008 pp 1285-1288
Ospina, Sonia and Angel Saz.
“Leadership in Inter-organizational Networks,” 21st Century Management: A Reference Handbook, Volume 2, Sage: Los Angeles, 2008, pp. 291-300
Ospina, Dodge, Foldy, and Hofmann.
“Taking the Action Turn: Lessons from Bringing Participation to Qualitative Research,” Handbook of Action Research, 2nd Ed. Sage Publications, 2008.
This chapter tells the story of our decision to introduce participation as a key feature of a qualitative research project about social change leadership. We analyze the context that influenced our choice to create a ‘hybrid' design; discuss the subsequent choices we made about
our ‘positionality' vis-à-vis research participations and the kind of knowledge we produced; and reflect on the tensions these choices created with respect to control over the research process, its action orientation, and whose voice was represented. Embracing participation enriched the research but also provided hard-earned lessons about the trade-offs of taking the action turn.
View Book
Ospina, S.; Dodge, J.; Foldy, E.G.; and Hofmann, A.
“Taking the action turn: Lessons from bringing participation to qualitative research,” Handbook of Action Research, 2nd Edition. 2008
2007
Foldy, Erica and Laurie Goldman, Sonia Ospina.
“Sensegiving and the Role of Cognitive Shifts In the Work of Leadership,” Forthcoming in Leadership Quarterly
Sensegiving -- shaping how people understand themselves, their work, and others engaged in that work -- is critical to the work of organizational leadership. We propose the –cognitive shift,– a change in how an organizational audience understands an important element of the organization–s work, as a desired outcome of the sensegiving process. Organizations try to spur these shifts in two categories: about their issue and about their primary constituency, the population it is designed to serve or mobilize. This approach makes two contributions: It re-directs attention from individual leaders– behaviors and characteristics to the work of leadership, as opposed to the agents through which it is carried out. Second, it operationalizes the intangible process of meaning-making by breaking it down into discrete units that are relatively equivalent and, therefore, comparable, providing a systematic way to analyze and map cognitive leadership processes.
View report
2006
Ospina, Sonia and Georgia Sorenson.
“A Constructionist Lens on Leadership: Charting New Territory,” The Quest for a General Theory of Leadership edited by Goethals, George and Sorenson, Georgia, Edward Elgar Publishers, 2006.
The April, 2003 meeting of the general theory scholars included invitations to scholars utilizing action-research methodologies as well as to practitioners on the frontline of leadership development in communities. Ospina discussed the participant-centered research she and her colleagues are undertaking for the Ford Foundation's Leadership for a Changing World program and shared with the other scholars some findings emerging from this approach. Using a constructionist lens, Ospina and her colleagues are working with social change leaders to understand how leadership emerges and develops in community-based organizations engaged in social change agendas.
View Book
Ospina, Sonia.
“Governance and Leadership for Social Change,” Reforma y Democracia, CLAD, Venezuela, No. 35(2006), pp. 93-122
Ospina, Sonia
“An Invisible Actor in US Governance: the Role of Civil Society Organizations in the Creation of Social Change Leadership,” Reforma y Democracia. CLAD, Venezuela, forthcoming, 2006. (in Spanish)
2005
Ospina, Sonia and Jennifer Dodge.
“Narrative Inquiry and the Search for Connectedness: Practitioners and Academics Developing Public Administration Scholarship,” Public Administration Review, July/August 2005, Vol 65, No. 4.
Maintaining a vibrant field of public administration requires ongoing efforts to link the worlds of academic researchers and practitioners. We suggest that research itself, traditionally pursued by academics, is a promising mechanism for making this connection. In particular, researchers and practitioners in public administration can do research together in a way that enhances mutual learning, draws on the strengths of each to create useful knowledge of high quality, appreciates and tolerates of each others' worlds, styles, and contributions. Using research to promote connectedness means rethinking the roles that practitioners and academics play in generating knowledge in the field. In our project, insights from the assumptions and practices of narrative inquiry helped us to identify three research roles for practitioners: as sources of knowledge, as producers of knowledge, and as active consumers who inform the research process.
View publication
Dodge, Jennifer, Sonia M. Ospina and Erica Gabrielle Foldy.
“Integrating Rigor and Relevance in Public Administration Scholarship: The Contribution of Narrative Inquiry,” Public Administration Review, Vol. 65, May/June, No.3, pp. 286.
A traditional view of scholarly quality defines rigor as the application of method and assumes an implicit connection with relevance. But as an applied field, public administration requires explicit attention to both rigor and relevance. Interpretive scholars' notions of rigor demand an explicit inclusion of relevance as an integral aspect of quality. As one form of interpretive research, narrative inquiry illuminates how this can be done. Appreciating this contribution requires a deeper knowledge of the logic of narrative inquiry, an acknowledgement of the diversity of narrative approaches, and attention to the implications for judging its quality. We use our story about community-based leadership research to develop and illustrate this argument.
Download publication
Ospina, Sonia M. and Jennifer Dodge.
“It's About Time: Catching Method Up to Meaning-The Usefulness of Narrative Inquiry in Public Administration Research,” Public Administration Review, Vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 143.
A traditional view of scholarly quality defines rigor as the application of method and assumes an implicit connection with relevance. But as an applied field, public administration requires explicit attention to both rigor and relevance. Interpretive scholars' notions of rigor demand an explicit inclusion of relevance as an integral aspect of quality. As one form of interpretive research, narrative inquiry illuminates how this can be done. Appreciating this contribution requires a deeper knowledge of the logic of narrative inquiry, an acknowledgement of the diversity of narrative approaches, and attention to the implications for judging its quality. We use our story about community-based leadership research to develop and illustrate this argument.
Download publication
2004
Ospina, S., J. Dodge, B. Godsoe, J. Mineri S. Reza and E. Schall.
“From Consent to Mutual Inquiry: Balancing Democracy and Authority in Action Research,” Action Research, March 2004, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 47-69 (22) Sage Publications.
The Leadership for a Changing World (LCW) program is a joint endeavor between the Ford Foundation, the Advocacy Institute, and the Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service. This paper focuses on the experiences of the Research and Documentation component of LCW – lead by a research team from the Wagner School – during the initial implementation phases of the research. This component formed an inquiry group consisting of both academic researchers and social change practitioners to collaboratively explore and discover the ways in which communities doing social change engage in the work of leadership. We used group relations theory to understand a series of critical dilemmas and contradictions experienced by the coresearchers. This paper identifies four such paradoxes that center around issues of democracy and authority.
View publication
Ospina, Sonia, Nuria Cunill, and Ariel Zaltsman.
“Performance Evaluation, Public Management Improvement and Democractic Accountability: Some Lessons from Latin America,” Public Management Review, Spring 2004, Vol 6, no. 2, pp. 230-251.
The results-oriented management reforms fostered by the New Public Management movement are often argued to emphasize the search for efficiency, quality and other typical market values at the expense of democratic accountability. On the other hand, challenging this view, some authors claim that results-based management reforms have the potential to enhance political accountability and representative democracy. There is however, limited empirical evidence of this relationship. This article uses some of the findings from a comparative study of public management evaluation systems in four Latin American countries to illuminate this relationship in practice. We discuss the fact that, in two of the four countries surveyed, the design features of the new systems were based on the explicit search for increased political accountability and the deepening of democracy. We also discuss the possible causes for the finding that the outcome and performance information generated is not being applied for decision-making purposes yet, as expected.
Ospina, Sonia.
“Qualitative Research,” In G. R. Goethals, G. S. Sorenson, & J. M. Burns, Encyclopedia of Leadership 2004, pp. 1279-1284. 2004. Thousand Oaks, CA.
People are fascinated by the stories of leaders, but not much has been written about the forces that shape them. This set brings together "what truly matters about leadership" to map an emerging discipline that draws from history, philosophy, sociology, anthropology, political science, and psychology. It seeks to answer questions such as what is leadership? What is a great leader? What is a great follower? What are the types of leadership? And how does someone become a leader?
Research Center for Leadership in Action 
Schall, Ellen, Sonia Ospina, Bethany Godsoe, and Jennifer Dodge.
“Appreciative Narratives as Leadership Research: Matching Method to Lens
,” In David Cooperrider and Michel Avital (eds), Advances in Appreciative Inquiry Vol 1: Constructive Discourse and Human Organization. 2004. Elsevier Science, Ltd.
This chapter explores the potential of appreciative inquiry for doing empirical
work on leadership. We use a framework that matches a constructionist theoretical lens,
an appreciative and participative stance, a focus on the work of leadership (as opposed to
leaders), and multiple methods of inquiry (narrative, ethnographic and cooperative). We
elaborate on our experiences with narrative inquiry, while highlighting the value of doing
narrative inquiry in an appreciative manner. Finally, we suggest that this particular
framework is helping us see how social change leadership work reframes the value that
the larger society attributes to members of vulnerable communities.
Research Center for Leadership in Action 
Download publication
Dodge, Jennifer, Sonia Ospina, and Roy Sparrow.
“Making Partnership A Habit: Margie McHugh and the New York Immigration Coalition,” Synergos Bridging Leadership Resource Center. Synergos Institute, New York, 2004.
The strategies and methods used by the New York Immigration Coalition (NYIC) are attracting increased attention for their sustainable collaborative systems that address critical social and economic needs. This case focuses on the evolution of NYIC's successful methods for building bridges across sectors and among a diverse group of immigrant communities, and the leadership approach that made it work.
View report
2003
Ospina, Sonia.
“Understanding Cooperative Behavior in Labor Management Cooperation: A Theoy-Building Exercise,” Public Administration Review, July 2003, vol.63, no.4, pp. 455-471(17) Blackwell Publishing Inc.
This article proposes a theory of how mandated institutional cooperation transforms into individual cooperative behavior. Using qualitative strategies, we draw insights about cooperation in three public-sector efforts of labor-management cooperation (LMC). We report an association between critical shifts in the roles of stakeholders and the change from adversarial to cooperative labor relations. While managers became team players along with their employees, labor representatives assumed managerial responsibilities. These changes were also associated with a service-oriented perspective, better understanding of the other's experiences, and a view of cooperation as partnership. At the heart of these transformations, we found critical changes in communication patterns associated with incrementally growing levels of trust. We propose a model that depicts the links between collective and individual levels of organizational action related to LMC. We conclude that the positive shifts in mental models regarding work and the value of cooperation justify the promotion of LMC efforts.
Ospina, Sonia and Allon Yaroni.
“Enacting Labor Management Cooperation: New Competencies for the New Times,” in Jonathan Brock and David B. Lipsky (ed.) Going Public: The Role of Labor-Management Relations in Delivering Quality Government Services. Champaign, Illinois: Industrial Relations Research Association. 2003, pp. 137-170.
The public sector currently employs around 40 percent of all union members in the United States. Pressures for cost-effective and quality government services have placed new demands on the labor-management relationship. A fluctuating set of expectations about the appropriate responsibilities of government and a shifting political culture are severely testing the ability of the public sector to meet demands for increased accountability and expanded services. Especially in an age of knowledge workers, the traditional division between labor and management regarding leadership and work may no longer be viable. Going Public examines the forces affecting labor and management and the prospects for adopting service-oriented cooperative relationships as a key strategy for meeting the expanded demands on the public sector.
View Book
Ospina, Sonia and Nuria Cunill.
“Una Agenda de Investigaci–n Sobre la Evaluaci–n de los Resultados de la Gestion P–blica,” (A Research Agenda about Outcome Evaluation of Public Management) in Cunill, Nuria, Ospina, Sonia (ed.) Evaluaci–n de Resultados para una Gesti–n P–blica Moderna y Democr–tica. Experiencias Latinoamericanas. Venezuela: CLAD–Editorial Texto, 2003, pp. 11-42.
more