November 8, 2014

As published in APPAM/NASPAA

Click here for the YouTube video

On November 6, 2014 Labs Director, Neil Kleiman led joint APPAM/ NASPAA panel entitled Capitalizing the “P” in Public Service Education: Defining a New Framework for Linking our Schools & Research to the Policymaking

This panel presents a new framework that links academic and policymaking communities. Panelists describe ambitious new projects with the White House, National Science Foundation and local officials that are demonstrating ways that schools of public administration are overcoming cynicism and positively influencing policy throughout the country. This session reviews successful attempts to place schools at the center of policymaking discussions and decisions; identifies the opportunities and challenges that exist within the research-academic-policy nexus; examines how policy engagements lead to significant benefit to home institutions; and identifies ways that schools can work together and participate in existing and burgeoning networks.

 


July 15, 2014

As published in
NRNlogo.png

Click here for the National Resource Network blog post

Resurgent Cities and What They Can Teach Us

Big cities are the ones that typically garner all the attention. But this time it’s small and mid-sized locales that are the focus of a new book called Revitalizing American Cities. This volume, edited by Susan Wachter of the University of Pennsylvania and Kimberly Zeuli of ICIC, contains contributions from many of the leading scholars in the field of urban policy. Each author is focused less on stats and oriented more toward providing pragmatic recommendations for how communities—particularly older industrial ones—can re-imagine their city and local economy.

Click here to read more.
 


June 3, 2014

As published in
Governing.png

Click here for the Governing article

From Washington, a '311' for Cities

Consumers everywhere have a voracious demand for customized data. And in just the past few years local governments have gotten remarkably good at responding. The growing proliferation of local 311 systems and where-is-my-bus-type apps allows citizens to quickly -- if not immediately -- get the information and guidance they need.

Remarkably, however, local governments do not have access to the same kinds of organization tools, platforms or information for their own use. Cities confronted with a range of persistent challenges -- from pension liabilities to failing school systems -- often lack the means to consult with the right experts or have the time to identify the federal programs, best practices or foundation initiatives that could help them.

In an effort to provide this kind of guidance for cities, the Obama administration recently announced the launch of the National Resource Network. A pilot program with an initial $10 million award from the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the initiative aims to be a one-stop resource for technical, policy and financial assistance for local governments.

Click here to read more.

 


 

May 16, 2014

As published in
KSG.png

Click here for the blog article

Tackling Inequity with a Long View

The Great Recession has receded, but the economic well-being of many Americans continues to stagnate or sink. According to a Brookings analysis by Alan Berube, the income divide is deepest in our biggest and most economically successful cities: in cities as diverse as Atlanta, San Francisco, Miami, and Boston, households in the 95th percentile of income earn over 15 times those in the 20th percentile.

How can mayors best tackle such inequality? One of us is more conservative economically in his outlook and the other more progressive. Sharp lines often divide these camps. For us the common ground exceeds the differences—we both believe cities are great places and should in the Jane Jacobs sense build the middle class. We also believe that vast income disparity threatens the civic fabric.

Click here to read more.

 


 

March 2014

As published in

Click here for the Population Health article

Pay-for-Success Financing: A New Vehicle for Improving Population Health?
Megan Golden

You may have heard about “pay for success financing,” also called “social impact bonds,” the new kind of financing that is capturing the imagination of government, foundations, socially minded investors and social service programs around the world. Invented in the United Kingdom in 2010, pay- for-success financing (PFS) is designed to bring substantial new financing to programs whose long-term benefits to society—and savings to government—exceed their costs. 

What is this new financing mechanism all about? Can it be used to bring new resources to population health improvement  programs and shift resources from treatment to prevention? A feasibility study I conducted for the Institute for Child Success (ICS) with offices in both Greenville and Columbia, S.C., helps explain how PFS works and can be applied to population health and improve health outcomes. 

Click here to read more.

 

 

March 26, 2013

As published in
Governing.png

Click here for the Governing article

The Very Busy Process of Delivering Innovation

Paras Desai's schedule looks like a government innovation immersion course.

Desai is the director of Chicago's Innovation Delivery Team, one of five such units that are working within city governments in a project funded by Bloomberg Philanthropies. Desai's team currently has more than 20 initiatives under way, at a range of different stages, which means that Desai gets to experience every aspect of the innovation process--from "ideation" to evaluation--all at once and pretty much all the time.

Click here to read more.

 


 

December 11, 2012

As published in
Governing.png

Click here for the Governing article

The Skills an Innovation Team Really Needs

Innovation Delivery Teams are dedicated units within city governments designed to quickly and nimbly tackle multiple issues ranging from murder reduction to small-business growth. But how can one group of eight to 10 people attain subject-matter fluency, or even competency, on so many radically different issues--issues other civil servants have spent their careers mastering? The answer is simple: They can't. And they don't need to.

Click here to read more.

 


 

October 11, 2012

As published in
Governing.png

Click here for the Governing article

How 'Ideation' Can Power Innovation

The innovation delivery teams that five cities across the country have launched are part of an effort, supported by the Bloomberg Philanthropies, to produce smarter, more informed, big-picture solutions to significant policy and service-delivery challenges. At the core of their efforts is a concept known as "ideation."

In the context of local-government innovation, "ideation" means directly examining a problem in a systematic way, amassing many possible solutions culled from many places, and then probing and testing those ideas to see which are most likely to work.

This post, the fourth in a series on the topic of innovation delivery teams, offers something of a beginner's guide for cities interested in using ideation to help them set better policy; a full report on the subject can be found here.

Click here to read more.

 


 

August 14, 2012

As published in
Governing.png

Click here for the Governing article

Kick-Starting the Flow of Ideas

In this series of columns, I have been exploring the concept of "ideation" — a fancy word for the process of developing and testing new ideas. For cities, this requires both fostering creativity and gaining different perspectives, and while that might sound simple, it can actually be quite disruptive. Idea generation and development demands that everyone involved get out of his or her comfort zone to see and discuss things afresh. There is a powerful tool for engendering this kind of mindset: competition.

Click here to read more.

 


 

July 10, 2012

As published in
Governing.png

Click here for the Governing article

How 'Ideation' is Growing Business in Memphis

City leaders face tremendous pressure to respond to crises quickly and decisively, and they frequently excel at doing just that. "What are we going to do about this?" or "What can we do about this?" are the sort of questions that drive policy. Too rarely, however, do city officials have the time and space to ask, "What should we do about this?"
 
In short, municipal policymaking is often a reactive process rather than an active one.

Click here to read more.

 


 

June 12, 2012

As published in
Governing.png

Click here for the Governing article

Incorporating Innovation into Local Government

Backed by $24 million in foundation funds, five cities are creating dedicated teams in their mayors' offices to look for ways to fundamentally restructure how the cities do what they do. There is much to be learned from this ambitious effort.
 
In an economic downturn that has left municipal budgets tight and the need for government services great, the interest in creative thinking about local problems is understandably intense. The number of Google hits on the words “government innovation” has increased in just the past two years from 38 million to 1.4 billion as leaders and line staff at every level of government look to do more with less.

Click here to read more.