Determining the Empirical Impact of Corporate Independent Expenditures on Elections and Political Integrity

Client
Brennan Center for Justice
Faculty
Charles Brecher, Maria Doulis
Team
Richard Lee, Manuel Morales, Alexandra Nigolian, Natalie Pregibon, Emily Ryder

The Brennan Center for Justice at the NYU School of Law is a non­partisan think tank that combines public policy and public interest law to advocate for measurable legislative and legal changes that advance fundamental issues of democracy and jus­tice in the legal sector. Following the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission Supreme Court decision, the Brennan Center for Justice commissioned a Capstone team to examine the impact that corporate independent expenditures have on repre­sentative democracy. To understand the effect, the Capstone team compared trends in democratic indicators such as voter turnout, electoral competitiveness, and corruption convictions across states with varying historical restrictions on cor­porate independent expenditures. The information was compiled and analyzed to support the Brennan Center's campaign finance litigation efforts.

Case Management and Systems Administration for a Complex Legal Services Program

Client
Main Street Legal Services
Faculty
Sean Harvey
Team
Alexandra Brown, Elizabeth Burger, Shujie Jiang, Patrick Mangan

Main Street Legal Services (MSLS) is the clinical training program at CUNY Law School. MSLS has seven clinics, each of which operates as an independent silo of activity, with its own administrative proto­cols for case intake, case tracking, record keeping, communications, and conflict checking. The organization approached the Capstone team for advice on how to manage seven divergent practice areas in a coordinated fashion and implement and enforce uniform administrative protocols across the clinics. Of specific concern was the failure of many clinics to maintain comprehensive case records in the shared electronic case management system. The Capstone team conducted a review of the organization's administrative practices, surveyed key stakeholder groups (faculty, staff, students), and contacted other law firms and clinical programs to identify best practices in the field. The final report con­sisted of internal research findings, best practices of peer institutions, and recom­mendations that will streamline adminis­trative processes to strengthen the provision of quality client services and legal instruction.

Building Blocks for Growth

Client
The White House Project
Faculty
Ana Oliveira, Dennis Smith
Team
Lauren Caruso, Marcus Escobedo, Edline Jacquet, Carly Marie Knudson, Lauren Sargent
Building Blocks for Growth

The White House Project (TWHP) is a national nonprofit organization that uses multi­platform programs to advance women's leadership in all communities and across sectors—up to the U.S. presi­dency—by filling the leadership pipeline with a diverse, critical mass of women. Now at a pivotal point in its organizational lifecycle, TWHP requested a Capstone team to gather information about the organization's capacity to expand its pro­grammatic reach. To help TWHP under­stand its growth potential, the Capstone team first compiled and reviewed program survey data to develop an alumnae track­ing instrument and analyzed the organiza­tion's financial condition. Then, the team compiled a variety of growth strategies and best practices through an environmental scan and included recommendations for an “incubator model” of expansion. Finally, the team provided a general list of indicators of successful growth and obstacles for TWHP to consider when undertaking expansion. The Capstone team intends for the report to enable TWHP to develop the financial requirements and operational strategies necessary to facilitate growth as the organization seeks to reach more women across the country and have a greater influence nationally.